Home |
About Us |
Products |
Photo Album |
Technical Questions |
Nutrition Management |
Publications |
Adverts |
Current Topics
Current Topics
Multi-Peril Crop Insurance Scheme
During recent meetings of farm leaders and farmers (Farm Weekly News, 23 September 2010),
WAFarmers Corrigin-Lake Grace Zone president said farmers' financial problems were being
aggravated by the absence of a MPCI scheme (Multi-Peril Crop Insurance). The current dry
conditions and stressed crops has a lot of farmers very scared out there and its very serious he
said. WAFarmers president put forward the importance of leadership on this issue. WAFarmers
Dry Season Advisory Committee chairman said The State Government is committed to
investigating the possibility of a MPCI scheme on a commercial footing (Countryman News, 30
September 2010).
A multi-peril crop insurance scheme would increase security for farmers, however the fundamental
reasons which makes crops highly susceptible to dry spells or frosts will not be solved for next
season unless crop-management changes are made. Without improvements to crop productivity
management, the multi-peril crop insurance premiums are bound to increase. The problems arise
from poor water-use efficiency of crops as a result of incomplete nutritional regimes, increasing
vulnerability to dehydration during dry spells resulting in lowered yields and quality . Low 'BRIX'
levels in stems and leaves correlates with susceptibility of crops to damage as a result of trace
elements, potassium and magnesium deficiencies leading to low levels of soluble sugars, minerals,
vitamins, amino acids and proteins in plant sap . High BRIX readings around this time means that
the crop is doing well, and has an excellent chance of standing up to adverse weather. As
immunity to a severe drought or a severe frost event can never be assured however, a MPCI which
includes drought and frost damage is definitely needed to protect farmers.
Australian farmers have made great strides in many areas of crop husbandry, but have fallen short
in keeping up with the complex nutritional needs of crops and pastures. New technologies
introduced by foliar and liquid fertilizers containing a full spectrum of nutrients has been adopted
only by few farmers, and generally, crops have been left to fend for themselves using older
technology. Crops that perform badly during dry spells have insufficient root growth for accessing
nutrients and soil moisture, as well as suffering stress from a whole range of nutrient deficiencies.
Deficiencies can be identified by grain analysis before sowing the seed and deficient nutrients
added to fertilizers, followed by seed-applied trace elements and foliar fertilizers to boost root
growth. The critical connection between the viability of a MPCI scheme underpinned by productive
nutrition as a necessary component should be clearly explained to farmers by the Department of
Agriculture and Food. Because of decreasing rainfall from climate change, more emphasis on
updating dry-land farming techniques to include use of sophisticated foliar fertilizers is urgently
needed.
This brings us back to leadership and accountability. Australian farmers, rightly or wrongly, rely on
farm industry leaders to show the way by quickly changing and updating technology themselves,
i.e. lead by example. Starting from the Minister of Agriculture and Food, leaders are from the
various farmer organizations and committees, officers of Department of Agriculture and Food,
corporate CEOs and managers of big agribusiness, large-scale farmers, and owners and
managers of small agribusiness; all from whom the majority of farmers expect qualities of
leadership, innovation and improvements of technology for economic survival. Posted October 10, 2010.
Starter Liquid Fertilizers: Strategies for Growers
Farmers who traditionally use granular fertilizers only for small grain crops are now increasingly interested in
starter liquid fertilizers. What constitutes a good starter liquid fertilizer, how do you use them, and how good
are they in improving yields, are questions often asked. The Western Australian Department of Agriculture is currently
focussing on improving yields for hard- pressed growers (a result of recent droughts and unreliable rainfall)
through the Bridge the Yield Gap Project, and would probably be looking closely at the contribution starter
liquid fertilizers make to yields and profitability.
Applied early to crops to give them a good start, starter liquid fertilizers have been in use for quite a
while, but understanding how they work, and improvements in their chemistry and application methods are
exciting developments for technology-savvy farmers. By definition, starter fertilizers include granulated
starter NPK fertilizers applied in the traditional 2 x 2 sowing system (2 inches under and 2 inches to the
side of the seed); but those who are making rapid gains in yields and profitability are those who use combinations
of the granular 2 x 2 system and liquid starter fertilizers 2 x 2 banding. Australian farmers familiar with both
systems have shown that the visible, easily monitored, surface applied (see Photo Album this website) and dribble
liquid applications are essentially equal in effect to the 2 x 2 soil banding of starter liquids (see also: Fluid
Fertilizer Foundation, Newsletter 2011: "Don't forget starter fertilizer - Especially now"; Fertilizer Technology,
bulletin sf-021, 2011: "Starter fertilizers - Salvation for cost-squeezed corn growers").
The possibility is there for increasing the use of simpler, quicker and more efficient liquid fertilizer systems,
whilst saving on the more expensive and complicated attachments to seeders. Liquid fertilizers are still more
expensive compared to granular fertilizers (which have been on the scene for much longer), so can we offset the
extra cost with the greater efficiency of soil applied liquid fertilizers and foliar fertilizers? Research on
fertilizer responses has shown that foliar fertilizers utilize a high efficiency ratio of 7:1 and are more
efficient for uptake than soil-applied or broadcast granulated fertilizers (Source: Michigan State University,
USA). As discussed below, the answers all rely on the superior chemistry and agronomy possible by the use of
starter liquid fertilizers in both soil-applied and foliar applications targeting favorable biological responses
of crops and microbes.
A seed that is sown in the traditional 2 x 2 system can find itself looking for nutrients on germination.
For a small seed, the presence of a nutrient band a few inches away is still a long way. This is a critical
period for seeds if it germinates during cold or very wet conditions, and its food and nutrient reserves are
fast running out. Some seeds with low reserves, harvested from crops grown in nutrient-deficient soils (e.g.
low phosphorus, potassium, zinc, molybdenum etc.) find themselves in a precarious position. At this time too,
the small seed needs to grow a good root system to access soil moisture, mobilize its food reserves of proteins,
carbohydrates and vitamins for energy to open its first leaf (leaves) and start manufacturing new food through
photosynthesis. It is during this early period of meristematic growth that the most damage to potential yields
from nutrient deficiencies occur. During early cell divisions which determines the number of tillers and health
of reproductive tissue which ultimately give rise to seeds for the next generation, all nutrients including
phosphorus, potassium, trace and ultra-trace elements are of critical importance. To determine the dose rates
of trace elements, grain analysis before sowing is especially important to identify potential deficiencies,
which can be prevented with applied fertilizers. Plants deficient in trace elements emerge as spindly, frail
plants with a small mass of roots, and do not have the energy to withstand adverse weather (increasingly changeable),
plant diseases and insect pests.
During the early growth stage, fast growing root tissues of mycorrhizal- hosting plants (e.g. wheat, barley, oats,
corn, rice, sorghum, lupin,soybean, lucerne, chickpeas) are colonized to form plant/arbuscular mycorrhiza relationships
which through the extra-radicle mycelia (fine root hairs) enhances the young plant's ability to access nitrogen,
mineral nutrients (phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sulphur, trace elements) and water. Treatment to the
seed coat before seeding, with a seed dressing containing phosphorus and trace elements, attracts and enhances
colonization by mycorrhizal fungi, as well as preventing deficiencies occurring during early growth. Seed treatment
just before sowing is the earliest applied
starter liquid fertilizer and an excellent investment for growers as the
low dose rate/ha is highly economical.
As discussed elsewhere on this website, grain analysis helps to guide growers on the amounts of individual nutrients
needed to achieve a targeted yield level. It can be seen that the amounts of the major elements needed to achieve, say
4 - 6 tons/ha of grain are quite substantial, and cannot be satisfied with a seed treatment. At seeding, the ideal,
easily monitored way to apply the necessary amounts of liquid nutrients is with the use of a manifold distributor to
dribble starter fertilizer on the soil surface, about 2 - 3 inches above the seed following the press wheels (if used).
Desirable characteristics of starter liquid fertilizers are high analysis, solubility, balanced formulation and chelation
of trace elements to prevent fixation on clay minerals, completeness of nutrients with compatibility and stability, and
an acidic pH reaction of the liquid fertilizer which prevents urea applied at this time from releasing ammonia which could
harm the seed. Phosphorus at early growth stages is particularly important for plants, and is in highly available and soluble
forms as mineral ortho-phosphates which provide a constant buffer against pH changes. Organic components such as fish emulsion
activates vital microbes.
Starter liquid fertilizers utilizing the economical Blend-Tech System can also be applied at the next highly desirable
stage, the early 2-leaf stage when the seedling is just beginning rapid development. The possession of a substantial
root system at this stage allows the young plant to make good use of the nutrients applied with a conventional boom
sprayer ideal for easy application and even coverage of crops. More and more growers are now opting for this early
2-leaf stage of growth to apply substantial amounts of nutrients to prevent deficiencies and help insure high yield
potentials. At this time, healthy growth of the young plant and rapid canopy development competes effectively against
weeds through shading. Opportunities for highly efficient foliar application and uptake of nutrients occurs at the
5-leaf stage or at tillering (adjacent rows touching). Increasingly, starter liquid fertilizers are being used by
growers to make up time for late starts due to late breaks or excessive rainfall. Posted July 5, 2011.
Grain Analysis: the 4 Rs
How to interpret your grain results: identify deficient nutrients and plan fertilizer inputs for productivity
Grain analysis is a user-friendly means to interpret the nutritional status of soils and to assist in making decisions on the types and
amounts of fertilizer to use for the following season, for a particular, desired yield.
Recently, internationally leading organizations, the Fertilizer Institute, Canadian Fertilizer Institute, International Plant Nutrition
Institute and International Fertilizer Industry Association has endorsed the use of grain analysis for improved Nutrient Stewardship
(see.. "The role of grain nutrient analysis in fertility management"). They are promoting the implementation of the 4 Rs as a
framework for nutrient stewardship to achieve cropping system goals such as increased production, increased farmer profitability,
enhanced environmental protection and improved sustainability.
To achieve those goals, the 4R concept involves choosing the:
Right fertilizer source
Right fertilizer rate
Right time to apply
Right place to apply
Grain analysis allows farmers to choose the Right fertilizer rate for a particular targeted yield.
On the Western Fertiliser Technology website, under Publications and Nutrition Management pages, data is available to assess the nutrient
status of wheat, barley, canola,and lupin grains.
The nutrient table for wheat gives the low, medium and high ranges for wheat grain samples received from the WA wheat-belt. For example,
in 20 years, no sample was received with a copper level lower than 1.1 ppm or a copper level higher than 5.5 ppm: the average copper level
over this long period of time, for thousands of wheat grain samples, was 3.9 ppm. So if your grain is showing an analysis level of 2.0 ppm,
you could safely assume that you need to increase the copper supply to your crop to increase yields for your next crop.
Grain analysis data for a full range of crops is urgently needed, and would be highly valuable for growers; a way to collate data for
other crops, e.g, rice, in a much shorter time frame of one year is discussed on the Technical Questions page of this website, under
grain analysis.
As fertilizer decisions are important for your farm, send the grain sample to a reliable, modern laboratory for analysis. If in doubt,
send the same sample to two independent laboratories to confirm the analyses on which you will base your fertilizer decisions for the
coming season. A major portion of a farmer's budget comprises purchase costs on fertilizer. Any nutrient misinterpreted as being in the
sufficiency range, when in fact it is deficient, would lead to serious loss of income and a waste of labor; especially for large areas
cropped as in Australia.
Let us say your 2011 yield for wheat was 2.0 tons/ha and you wish to target a higher yield in 2012, firstly by identifying, and then
increasing the application of fertilizers containing the deficient nutrients.
STEP 1
Calculate the amount of nutrients that 2 tons of wheat grain removed and was exported. By applying similar amounts of nutrients for the
2012 crop plus extra amounts for the deficient nutrients, you should be able to increase your yield in affordable steps each year.
By multiplying the yield and grain nutrient level, the removal rate of each nutrient in 2 tons/ha of wheat is obtained. For example,
let us calculate the N, P, K and Zinc removed in 2 tons/ha.
| N = 2.04 kg N/100 kg grain x 2000 kg grain/ha |
= 41 kg N/ha |
| P = 0.34 kg P/100 kg grain x 2000 kg grain/ha |
= 6.8 kg P/ha |
| K = 0.60 kg K/100 kg grain x 2000 kg grain/ha |
= 12 kg K/ha |
| Zn = 3 grams Zn/100 kg grain x 2000 kg grain/ha |
= 60 grams Zn/ha |
Calculating the same way for all nutrients, gives us a table for the removal of nutrients in 2 tons of wheat grain:
| N 41 kgs/ha |
Cu 8 gms/ha |
Co 0.12 gm/ha |
| P 6.8 kgs/ha |
Mn 124 gms/ha |
|
| K 12 kgs/ha |
Zn 60 gms/ha |
|
| Ca 1.0 kgs/ha |
Fe 62 gms/ha |
|
| Mg 2.9 kgs/ha |
B 11 gms/ha |
|
| S 2.9 kgs/ha |
Mo 1.3 gms/ha |
|
STEP 2
Compare the grain analysis results obtained from the laboratory with the table for wheat (under Publications this website).
For example, mark as M (medium) for those nutrient results which fall in the medium range (e.g. 0.27 - 0.34% for Phosphorus).
In the same way, categorize each nutrient as M (medium), H (high) or L (low).
STEP 3
Make a list of those nutrients that show up as L (low), with the analysis result shown next to the low level. For example:
| Phosphorus (P) |
L (0.20%) |
| Potassium (K) |
L (0.40%) |
| Copper (Cu) |
L (2.0 ppm) |
| Manganese (Mn) |
L (30 ppm) |
STEP 4
From the above results, a decision is made to increase fertilizer investment in P, K, Cu and Mn fertilizer, above that needed for
a 2-ton yield. We then choose the Right fertilizer source to increase yield, by increasing the input of the low nutrients proportionately.
Therefore we need approximately:
| P = 0.34%/0.20% x 6.8 kg P/ha |
= 11.5 kg P/ha |
| K = 0.60%/0.40% x 12 kg K/ha |
= 18 kg K/ha |
| Cu = 3.9 ppm/2.0 ppm x 8 gms Cu/ha |
= 16 gms Cu/ha |
| Mn = 62 ppm/30 ppm x 124 gms Mn/ha |
= 256 gms Mn/ha |
STEP 5
Make a decision for 2012 on the Right fertilizer source to choose for the deficient elements, keeping the other nutrients the same
amounts as used in 2011 (e.g. nitrogen and sulphur).
For phosphorus, a number of sources can be considered and the total amount needed for each source is calculated. Superphosphate contains
9% P, DAP contains 24.2 % P etc. For example:
| Superphosphate |
= 100 kg SP x 11.5 kg P/9.0 kg P |
= 125 kg SP/ha |
| DAP |
= 100 kg DAP x 11.5 kg P/24.2 kg P |
= 50 kg DAP/ha |
| MAP |
= 100 kg MAP x 11.5 kg P/27.8 kg P |
= 40 kg MAP/ha |
For Potassium:
| Muriate of Potash |
= 100 kg MOP x 18.0 kg K/52.3 kg K |
= 35 kg MOP/ha |
| Sulphate of Potash |
= 100 kg SOP x 18.0 kg K/44.8 kg K |
= 40 kg SOP/ha |
| Nitrate of Potash |
= 100 kg NOP x 18.0 kg K/38.6 kg K |
= 46.6 kg NOP/ha |
For Copper:
| Copper Sulphate |
= 100 g Copper Sulphate x 16 g Cu/25.4 g Cu |
= 60 grams Copper Sulphate/ha |
For Manganese:
| Manganese Sulphate |
= 100 g Manganese Sulphate x 256 g Mn/32.5 g Mn |
= 780 grams Manganese Sulphate/ha |
Part of the deficient major nutrients, phosphate and potash could best be used as granular fertilizers, and partly as the BLEND-Tech
products, BLEND- Mag, BLEND-Cal and BLEND-K. The deficient copper and manganese can be added during production of the BLEND-Tech products
as their sulphate salts, which are then chelated by the chelating agent in Super Energy, thus improving uptake efficiency. By utilizing
Super Energy product and the three foliar BLEND-Tech products, the goals of the Right time to apply for grain (Seed treatment, 2-leaf and
early tillering stages respectively) and the Right place to apply (seed, leaf) are achieved.
STEP 6
Send representative samples of wheat grain from your 2012 crop, and compare the 2012 analyses obtained against the analyses of the nutrients
in the 2011 crop. For this example, the nutrient elements in the 2011 crop that were deficient (P,K,Cu and Mn) should now be in the medium
range and yields considerably improved if satisfactory rainfall was received.
Conclusions:
Grain analysis of samples from different areas of WA has shown that different soil types often has shortages of different trace elements.
For example, in the southern WA areas of Kojonup and Katanning, manganese is usually a problem; in the southeast around Beverley and Brookton
it is usually copper; whilst in the northern areas of Geraldton and Chapman Valley it is often zinc. However, the large numbers of nutrient
elements involved in growing a crop - major elements, trace elements and ultra-trace elements, means that farmers will increasingly rely on
chemical analysis to prevent production losses from deficiencies and remain sustainable. With unreliable rainfall expected to increase with
climate change, improving water-use-efficiency (WUE) of crops by preventing nutrient deficiencies is increasingly important.
The discipline of analytical chemistry is as complex an area as nutrition and is a critical area for maintaining sustainability . Recent
introduction of powerful analytical techniques ICP-OES and/or ICP-MS, Zeeman Graphite AAS, etc. means that farmers can now confidently
rely on the accuracy of analytical results for interpretation of grain analysis results, and take action to avoid deficiencies; but choosing
the right laboratory is important. If in doubt, send your samples to well-equipped laboratories such as the Chemistry Centre or CSBP laboratories.
Identifying deficient elements with grain analysis, and using the Right fertilizer source to avoid deficiencies in the next crop is the Right
step for improving productivity and income for the farmer. Posted October 25, 2011.
Analysis: two-directional sowing of cereal and hay crops
In Australian broadacre agriculture, crops are traditionally sown in rows separated anywhere from between 10 inches to 24 inches or more.
Observing established crops, there are considerable spaces between the rows where the soil is not being used to support plants. There is
an increasing need to increase the area of agricultural land for crops, as well as the need to increase yields per hectare. Sowing crops
in two-directions and thus evenly increasing the spatial density of plants per unit area would be profitable for farmers; but this step
relies on preventing nutrient deficiencies by grain analysis before sowing.
What is it then that stops farmers from exploiting the considerable areas between the rows which can add up to anything between 30 - 40%
of cropping area? In Australian broadacre agriculture, there is understandable concern of insufficient rainfall in any season limiting
growth of crops, as well as concern of an early end of rainfall leading to a shortened growing season and resulting low yields. Concerns
that densely sown crops (from increased seeding rates along the rows) would result in competition for water and lower yields under these
conditions are understandable, given current best-practice of sowing broadacre crops with minimal risks. A close analysis of current
cropping practices reveals that there is considerable scope for increasing productivity by two-directional sowing followed by
fertilizing with granular and foliar fertilizers.
Crops suffering nutrient deficiencies tend to have shallower roots and reduced photosynthesis. Shallow roots makes the plant more prone
to dehydration during dry spells as water present deeper in the soil profile is inaccessible, affecting potential yields. The amount of
rain per hectare for each 25 mm (1 inch) of rainfall is however quite considerable, if calculated:
25/1000 metre water x 10,000 sq. metres/hectare = 250 tons water/hectare
If total rainfall during a growing season amounts to around 200 mm or more, 2000 tons water/hectare or more has been available to the
crop. To exploit this amount of rainfall by a densely sown crop, there is a need to firstly increase its water-use efficiency, and
secondly to increase root growth by preventing nutrient deficiencies.
Current best practices for growing broadacre crops has, unfortunately, ensured that crops growing in a row has little incentive for
exploiting the bulk of soil between the rows. Tillage along the row has loosened the soil for
easier root growth, as well as the
availability of granular fertilizer applied under the seed rows invites root growth along the rows instead of between the rows.
Water and N nutrient availability (incubatable soil nitrogen) is also enhanced along the tilled rows, where there is less soil compaction
compared to the untilled areas between the rows.
Advantages of two-directional sowing of crops includes:
- Better infiltration and harvesting of water and nutrients by roots along the two-direction tilled rows due to improved water movement along slopes.
- Easier movement and enhanced activity of earthworms and beneficial microbes across the field (rows are connected).
- Better capture of sunlight each day by crops, for longer photosynthesis time.
- Plants compete better against weeds by capturing more water, nutrients and providing less sunlight to weeds (shading). Weeds are surrounded on all sides, slowing their propagation.
- Less weeds and healthier crops means less disease and increased quality of crop (grain or hay).
- More economical use of herbicides and pesticides per unit area, as a result of more plants protected per unit area for the same treatment.
The disadvantage of growing a more compact, denser crop means a higher investment at sowing time for extra seed, fertilizer, fuel and
machinery (wear and tear). However the efficiencies gained by two-directional sowing need not necessarily mean a doubling of investment
in seed and fertilizer at sowing; if the total rates of seed and fertilizers used (granular and foliar) are adjusted according to targeted
yield.
Increasing water-use efficiency and productivity by two-directional sowing of crops relies heavily on the prevention of nutrient
deficiencies (see discussion of Liebig's law of limiting nutrients, etc., under Nutrition Management, this website). Analysis of
grains to identify and correct for nutrients deficient in the soil is needed for productivity gains (see above, Grain Analysis:
the 4 Rs; also under Publications page: Grain Analysis - a powerful method for predicting fertilizer requirements). Posted December 13, 2011.
Farmers and farmer organizations such as the National Farmers Federation (NFF) and the WA Farmers should ask the Grains Research and Development
Corporation (GRDC), and the Departments of Agriculture and Food to promote the use of grain analysis for identifying limiting nutrients, thereby
increasing grain yields plus quality. Protein production in wheat, for example, relies heavily not only on nitrogen fertilizer but requires a full
range of trace elements as well. Several trace elements are missing in most granular fertilizers sold to Australian farmers. Concerns on lower
quality of exported wheat were recently raised by customers to the NFF president (source: Farm Weekly, April 5, 2012 page 6). Posted April 17, 2012.
© 2005, Western Fertiliser Technology Pty Ltd.
Home |
About Us |
Products |
Photo Album |
Technical Questions |
Nutrition Management |
Publications |
Adverts |
Current Topics